Respect for the rule of law is a foundation stone for a healthy democracy. This respect begins with the cop on the corner and extends to decisions made by the Supreme Court. Without respect for the rule of law, anarchy and vigilantism will eventually rule the day. Fearful people will protect themselves, often in dangerous or divisive ways, in the quest for protection or justice.

Recent events raise fresh alarms about the diminished respect for the rule of law in our culture. Two prominent jury verdicts have prompted irresponsible statements from the radical left and radical right about the need to reject those verdicts in the name of justice. Of course, the loudest voices claim special insight into what constitutes justice — the position that serves their political or economic agenda. Another set of recent events that flaunts the rule of law has been the flash mob-like mass robberies of high-end retail stores in multiple cities. When large groups (as many as 80 in one case) of thieves ransack stores, with little fear of reprisal, disrespect for the rule of law is on full display.

These examples of flaunting or ridiculing the rule of law raise concerns about how people may respond when the Supreme Court rules on an important case that will come before them this week. The Court will consider the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that severely limits abortion. Legal commentators on both sides of the issue believe this case will cause the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade — the landmark decision that legalized abortion in the United States.

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, or even decides the Mississippi case in such a way abortion is curtailed, the response from the abortion industry (from social workers to pharmaceutical producers to politicians and fundraisers) may be troubling. Some abortion supporters are warning of an intense, even violent response if Roe v. Wade is ever overturned. This issue may provide a fresh test of our respect for the rule of law. For the most part, pro-life supporters have accepted Roe v. Wade as the law of the land. We have worked to change it, while nonetheless respecting the decision. It will be interesting to see how the other side responds if this precedent is overturned.

My hope is respect for the rule of law will carry the day. My fear is it may not. While our legal system is far from perfect, it is a positive and essential component of a healthy democracy. We cannot tear it down and expect to build society up. We can reform it (and should from time to time) but we cannot function without it. While mob rule is hard enough to manage when it involves protecting retail stores, it is much more challenging when it involves enforcing a Supreme Court decision. Despite the polarizing divisiveness of the issues, respect for the law and our legal system is essential for a stable society to endure. We must agree to foster that, even when we disagree strongly about specific legal issues.


Read More

Owning Up to the Failures of our Theological Heroes

What can be done when you discover the sins of historical figures who have shaped your theology?

Chris Woznicki
Affiliate Instructor in Theology at Fuller Seminary, JEC Research Fellow

Author’s Perspective: Andrew Fuller and the Search for a Faith Worthy of All Acceptation

Dr. David Rathel discusses his upcoming publication on Andrew Fuller.

David Rathel
Associate Professor of Christian Theology
Dr. Rathel is the associate professor of Chrisitian Theology at Gateway Seminary. Prior to Gateway, Dr. Rathel supplied pastoral care to churches in the United States and Scotland, served as an Adjunct Professor of Theology and Philosophy for the Baptist College of Florida, and provided teaching assistance for the University of St Andrews.

Listen

The Study Podcast
October 1, 2024

Revelation Chapters 2-3

In this episode, Dr. Alex Stewart and Tyler Sanders read through chapters 2 and 3 of Revelation, focusing on the seven letters to the seven churches in western Asia Minor. These seven letters share a repetitive structure, influenced by Imperial edicts and Old Testamen

Jonathan Edwards Center Podcast
September 25, 2024

Andrew Fuller’s Soteriology with Dr. David Rathel

Dr. David Rathel, associate professor of Christian Theology and the director of PhD and ThM research at Gateway Seminary, recently published his book and dissertation entitled, “Andrew Fuller and the Search for a Faith Worthy of All Acceptation: Exploring Fuller’s Sot


Watch

Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival

Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun

Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Get updates on new content!