Respect for the rule of law is a foundation stone for a healthy democracy. This respect begins with the cop on the corner and extends to decisions made by the Supreme Court. Without respect for the rule of law, anarchy and vigilantism will eventually rule the day. Fearful people will protect themselves, often in dangerous or divisive ways, in the quest for protection or justice.
Recent events raise fresh alarms about the diminished respect for the rule of law in our culture. Two prominent jury verdicts have prompted irresponsible statements from the radical left and radical right about the need to reject those verdicts in the name of justice. Of course, the loudest voices claim special insight into what constitutes justice — the position that serves their political or economic agenda. Another set of recent events that flaunts the rule of law has been the flash mob-like mass robberies of high-end retail stores in multiple cities. When large groups (as many as 80 in one case) of thieves ransack stores, with little fear of reprisal, disrespect for the rule of law is on full display.
These examples of flaunting or ridiculing the rule of law raise concerns about how people may respond when the Supreme Court rules on an important case that will come before them this week. The Court will consider the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that severely limits abortion. Legal commentators on both sides of the issue believe this case will cause the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade — the landmark decision that legalized abortion in the United States.
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, or even decides the Mississippi case in such a way abortion is curtailed, the response from the abortion industry (from social workers to pharmaceutical producers to politicians and fundraisers) may be troubling. Some abortion supporters are warning of an intense, even violent response if Roe v. Wade is ever overturned. This issue may provide a fresh test of our respect for the rule of law. For the most part, pro-life supporters have accepted Roe v. Wade as the law of the land. We have worked to change it, while nonetheless respecting the decision. It will be interesting to see how the other side responds if this precedent is overturned.
My hope is respect for the rule of law will carry the day. My fear is it may not. While our legal system is far from perfect, it is a positive and essential component of a healthy democracy. We cannot tear it down and expect to build society up. We can reform it (and should from time to time) but we cannot function without it. While mob rule is hard enough to manage when it involves protecting retail stores, it is much more challenging when it involves enforcing a Supreme Court decision. Despite the polarizing divisiveness of the issues, respect for the law and our legal system is essential for a stable society to endure. We must agree to foster that, even when we disagree strongly about specific legal issues.
Read More
Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward
Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.
Owning Up to the Failures of our Theological Heroes
What can be done when you discover the sins of historical figures who have shaped your theology?
Listen
Revelation Chapters 19-20
Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss the millennial debate. They cover different interpretations of the millennium, the strengths and weaknesses of each. They also describe the return of Christ and the final battle.
Revelation Chapters 17-18
Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss Revelation 17 and 18, focusing on the symbolic representation of Babylon. They explore the chiasm structure, highlighting the introduction and judgment of key adversaries like the dragon, the beast, and Babylon.
Watch
Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival
Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.
Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun
Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.