Over this past weekend, I attended a men’s ministry meeting at my current church and a worship service at my former church. Being at these church events reminded me it has been more than a decade since I have been a racial or cultural majority member of a church. Our former church was a multiracial, multicultural congregation. Our current church, while predominantly African-American, has a growing commitment to becoming more multiracial and multicultural.

Both of these churches have been positive examples of effective church ministry for the past decade. They have been through internal challenges—like pastoral changes and major building programs—while dealing with external problems like racial tension, political turmoil, and the current pandemic. Through it all, they have remained unified, focused, and missional. Particularly in light of current cultural challenges, especially racial tensions, it has been fulfilling to watch these churches thrive through diversity rather than be divided by it.

These churches are strong because they talk about racial and cultural issues openly, but in proportion to the frequency, they are mentioned in the Bible instead of how often they appear on Twitter. The pastors of these churches preach through books of the Bible or sections of books—no matter what is happening in the world around them. They emphasize what the Bible emphasizes and speak on cultural issues when they emerge from the text. During a recent series from the gospels on The Jesus Agenda, for example, my pastor preached how salvation, making disciples, community ministry, and global missions define our response to current cultural events.

These churches are strong because they celebrate their racial and cultural diversity—in proper perspective—rather than make those issues defining characteristics. They do not view the world through the lenses of race or culture. Instead, they view race and culture through the lens of the gospel. This perspective shift is profound. It allows differences to bring depth and variety to worship, Bible reading, prayer, and a host of other personal and church experiences. Diversity helps us experience God in new ways and appreciate different approaches—not define our tribe and separate us from others.

These churches are strong because their members treat each other as Christian individuals, not as stereotypical members of a group. When tough issues are raised, church members talk about them, pray about them, and resolve to hold on to each other. They actively resist demonizing others and work hard to preserve unity. Their members have a deep respect for each other and are determined to treat their fellow members like people who are going to heaven together—because they are.

These churches are positive examples of Christians coming together around biblical standards, missional priorities, and common ministry practices. Despite the formidable obstacles, they make it work! Being a part of these churches has made me a better Christian and leader—for which I am deeply grateful.


Read More

Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward

Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.

Philip O. Hopkins
Associate Professor of Church History
Philip O. Hopkins is the associate professor of Church history at Gateway Seminary. He earned Ph.D. in applied theology from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and a second Ph.D. in Iranian history from the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). He is also a research fellow for the Institute of Iranian Studies at the University of St. Andrews, guest lecturer at Russian-Armenian University in Yerevan, Armenia, and part of the editorial board for Iran and the Caucasus (Brill).

Owning Up to the Failures of our Theological Heroes

What can be done when you discover the sins of historical figures who have shaped your theology?

Chris Woznicki
Affiliate Instructor in Theology at Fuller Seminary, JEC Research Fellow

Listen

The Study Podcast
November 19, 2024

Revelation Chapters 19-20

Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss the millennial debate. They cover different interpretations of the millennium, the strengths and weaknesses of each. They also describe the return of Christ and the final battle.

The Study Podcast
November 12, 2024

Revelation Chapters 17-18

Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss Revelation 17 and 18, focusing on the symbolic representation of Babylon. They explore the chiasm structure, highlighting the introduction and judgment of key adversaries like the dragon, the beast, and Babylon.


Watch

Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival

Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun

Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Get updates on new content!