Southern Baptist churches, based on our baptism reports, are less and less effective at sharing the gospel in such a way people receive it and become Christians. The reasons for this vary from church to church, but there are some common problems that span geography, culture, and ministry style. This is the second installment in a summer series highlighting some of those issues and offering some suggestions for change. Another problem limiting evangelistic effectiveness is tolerance undermining persuasion.
Tolerance has been redefined in this generation. The word formerly meant patience and respect for persons who held positions with which you disagree. Postmodern thought has redefined the word to mean acceptance of every viewpoint as equally valid. Tolerance now means you embrace every “-ism,” tenet, or dogma as true. Suppose you believe Jesus is the only way of salvation but your friend believes all religions lead to heaven. Tolerance once meant you honored your friend’s opinion while patiently trying to persuade him or her to change their mind. Now, tolerance means you affirm your friend’s belief as equally valid or equally true with your position. This new politically correct definition of tolerance denies absolute truth and pronounces “true” whatever any person believes to be true. It’s the ultimate idolatry—venerating personal opinion as absolute truth.
Christians sometimes adopt this point of view out of fear of judging others. They take seriously Jesus’ warning, “Do not judge so that you won’t be judged” (Matthew 7:1). They are determined not to be judgmental, preferring to defer and avoid confronting anyone about their behavior or beliefs. Unfortunately, this understanding of avoiding being judgmental smacks more of the modern definition of tolerance than the genuine biblical ideal. Being judgmental, as defined by Jesus, is holding people to a standard you aren’t willing to meet yourself or criticizing people for their lifestyle choices on nonessential matters. It’s not equated with diluting core convictions of the Christian faith to keep from offending another person.
The Bible is very clear—the gospel and its implications must be shared, without compromise, even among people whose behavior and beliefs are contradicting both. A good example is Jesus’ conversation with the woman at the well (John 4). She was openly immoral (John 4:18) and tried to shift the focus by starting a debate about worship (John 4:19). Jesus was nonplussed and undeterred. He kept the focus on the woman’s need for a relationship with Him. Jesus didn’t say, “I understand your choices. If adultery is your sexual preference and worshipping your way makes you feel close to God, then I affirm the truth as you know it.” Instead, He confronted her immorality and confounded her misguided attempt to start an argument about worship practices.
Being judgmental is an attitude more than a set of words or actions. When Jesus confronted the woman at the well, something about Jesus’ approach touched her deeply and positively (John 4:29). When you share the gospel, your attitude should reflect humility and gentleness. When your words are steeped in compassion, even confrontation comes across as genuine love for the other person. Your witnessing role involves persuasion, sharing the gospel, and doing all you can to convince a person to place faith in Jesus. Don’t let a misguided definition of tolerance keep you from asking people to change their beliefs.
Solution: Stand firm against the cultural definition of tolerance as accepting all beliefs as equally true. Avoid the devilish misconception that holding to the truth of the gospel somehow judges others who disagree with you. Determine to share the gospel with compassion, persuading others in appropriate ways to follow Jesus. Remember, unscripted conversations aren’t always unfocused conversations. Listen to people attentively, but talk about the gospel with boldness and clarity.
Read More
Theology the Norwegian Way: The Curious Case of Gisle Johnson
Gisle Johnson was a prolific scholar who made significant contributions to Norwegian theology. However, with barely any of his works translated into English, few today know about this maverick scholar. Dr. Robb Torseth hopes to change that.
Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward
Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.
Listen
Revelation Chapters 19-20
Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss the millennial debate. They cover different interpretations of the millennium, the strengths and weaknesses of each. They also describe the return of Christ and the final battle.
Revelation Chapters 17-18
Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss Revelation 17 and 18, focusing on the symbolic representation of Babylon. They explore the chiasm structure, highlighting the introduction and judgment of key adversaries like the dragon, the beast, and Babylon.
Watch
Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival
Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.
Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun
Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.