Just when the theater-of-the-absurd that is American politics seems it cannot get any more bizarre, California Governor Gavin Newsome decides to add theologian-in-chief to his job responsibilities. He has placed billboards in multiple states—with a special message for Bible Belt states of Oklahoma and Mississippi. In those states the billboards ask and answer, “Need an abortion? California is ready to help”—followed by a quote from Matthew 12:31, “Love your neighbor as yourself. There is no greater commandment than these.”
Using the Bible to support abortion is a twisted attempt to provide theological support for failing to protect innocent life. It panders to the biblical sensibilities of people in states where there is still some level of biblical literacy and respect for biblical authority. It’s a brazen attempt to align abortion with biblical values by equating providing abortions as an act of love.
This kind of creative biblical interpretation is a new and burgeoning field. Voluminous material is now being produced by creative biblical interpreters to validate homosexual behavior, gender fluidity, and sexual liberties. These positions have at least four problems in common: they reject centuries of common-ground biblical interpretations by both Catholics and Protestants; they find never-before-discovered insights in ancient texts; they invent new hermeneutical methods; and they ignore the plain sense of Scripture.
As a seminary leader, it might seem like the first three problems would be most important to me. At Gateway, and schools like ours, we devote ourselves to interpreting the Bible with sound and consistent hermeneutics; with deference to and appreciation for common historical insights; and for logical consistency. Those things all matter—a great deal—in deciding what the Bible meant and means. They are what our faculty do every day in their respective disciplines.
Frankly, however, the final issue raised above is the most important one to me. Finding new interpretations in the Bible about abortion, homosexuality, gender, and morality denies the plain reading of Scripture. Seminary training, biblical dexterity, and theological sophistication is not required to read and understand the plain meaning of the Bible. Discovering what the Bible says on these issues is relatively straightforward—just read for basic comprehension of the simplest and most obvious meaning.
Sound biblical interpreters and theologians discover depths of meaning emerging from the plain meaning of biblical texts. They do not invent new, even contradictory, meanings to demonstrate their brilliance by correcting centuries of mis-interpretation. The best counter-balance to biblical and theological error is Christians who read their Bible. It is a relatively simple book with an easy-to-understand message. The problem is not understanding what it says, but doing it. And that is the real reason creative interpreters are so busy finding alternative—and more palatable—meanings. They are determined to justify disobeying God—and that’s a far more serious problem than political pandering.
Read More
Theology the Norwegian Way: The Curious Case of Gisle Johnson
Gisle Johnson was a prolific scholar who made significant contributions to Norwegian theology. However, with barely any of his works translated into English, few today know about this maverick scholar. Dr. Robb Torseth hopes to change that.
Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward
Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.
Listen
Textual Criticism
Dr. Wegner walks listeners through the basics of Textual Criticism; what it is, why it’s important, and how to understand the footnotes in your Bible. We recommend watching this video on YouTube as Dr. Wegner has a great powerpoint with visual examples of old manuscri
Inerrancy
The original authors of the Bible wrote their manuscripts without error, but is the modern version of the Bible we have today also inerrant? What is the difference between inerrancy and infallibility? Dr. Wegner covers these things in this episode and starts to explor
Watch
Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival
Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.
Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun
Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.