On a recent Sunday, a pastor remarked some of this church members had not resumed the habit of post-pandemic worship attendance. He lamented some of them might not be returning, citing their new habit of viewing online worship services or just not participating altogether. When he first used the word “habit” to describe church attendance, it struck me wrong. It seemed like a less-than-spiritual description of what should be a more than a habit.

But then a Scripture passage came to mind. The Bible says, “And let us consider one another in order to provoke love and good works, not neglecting to gather together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging each other, and all the more as you see the day approaching” (Hebrews 10:24-25).  The biblical writer reminded his readers neglecting church, and by inference attending church, is a habit. That reminder changed my perspective on the pastor’s use of habit to describe church attendance.

A habit is a pattern of behavior, initially intentional, but repeated so often it becomes routine. We establish habits to improve our lives. Positive habits entrench healthier behavioral patterns. They become engrained and produce permanent results. For example, changing food consumption patterns is healthier than going on a short-term diet. Establishing an exercise routine is better than binge workouts motivated by guilt. Habits begin with intentional choices but, as they become routine, result in lifestyle changes.

Church attendance is a good habit. It begins with an intentional choice to change based on a desire to learn a new way of life. Unbelievers often make this choice with hope a life change will result. Believers make this choice because they know church participation provides the support, training, and information they need to live out their spiritual commitments. Once church becomes a habit, we participate without asking “Do I go this week?” because we know something positive will happen as long as we invest ourselves in the opportunity.

During the pandemic, many believers switched to viewing online worship services. This has become a new habit. While it offered a positive means of maintaining a connection to their church during COVID, it is less effective for producing life change than attending worship services and other church events. How so? Because part of coming together is considering “one another in order to provoke love and good works.” In other words, the habit of church attendance is not just about you “getting something out of it.”  It is also what you do for others by your presence, involvement, and service.

Church attendance is a habit—a good habit. It’s time for believers to re-establish this habit. We need the discipline of gathering, for our benefit and the benefit of others we influence. Online options have been a good way to stay connected during the pandemic. But that habit can have the subtle negative aspect of being too self-focused. Assembling with other believers restores the balance of gathering to receive ministry as well as extend ministry to others. It’s time to restore this essential habit.


Read More

Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward

Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.

Philip O. Hopkins
Associate Professor of Church History
Philip O. Hopkins is the associate professor of Church history at Gateway Seminary. He earned Ph.D. in applied theology from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and a second Ph.D. in Iranian history from the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). He is also a research fellow for the Institute of Iranian Studies at the University of St. Andrews, guest lecturer at Russian-Armenian University in Yerevan, Armenia, and part of the editorial board for Iran and the Caucasus (Brill).

Owning Up to the Failures of our Theological Heroes

What can be done when you discover the sins of historical figures who have shaped your theology?

Chris Woznicki
Affiliate Instructor in Theology at Fuller Seminary, JEC Research Fellow

Listen

The Study Podcast
November 19, 2024

Revelation Chapters 19-20

Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss the millennial debate. They cover different interpretations of the millennium, the strengths and weaknesses of each. They also describe the return of Christ and the final battle.

The Study Podcast
November 12, 2024

Revelation Chapters 17-18

Dr. Stewart and Tyler discuss Revelation 17 and 18, focusing on the symbolic representation of Babylon. They explore the chiasm structure, highlighting the introduction and judgment of key adversaries like the dragon, the beast, and Babylon.


Watch

Jonathan Edwards and the Asbury Revival

Chris Chun and Chris Woznicki discuss the signs of true revival, signs of the work of the Holy Spirit, and why it is important to critically assess the characteristics of revival in a spirit of charity.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Jonathan Edwards and the Baptists | Douglas Sweeney, Nathan Finn and Chris Chun

Dr. Douglas Sweeney and Dr. Nathan Finn joined Dr. Chris Chun for a panel discussion on Jonathan Edwards, recorded live at the SBC Annual Meeting in Anaheim.

Chris Chun
Professor of Church History | Director, Jonathan Edwards Center
Dr. Chris Chun is the professor of Church History and the director of Jonathan Edwards Center at Gateway Seminary. Chris’ doctoral research at St. Andrews University was focused on the eighteenth-century Edwardsean Baptists in Britain. He also has served as president of The Evangelical Theological Society (Far West Region).

Get updates on new content!