Renaming something, including coining a new word to describe something, is common today. When people do this, they seem to be trying to accomplish one of several outcomes. First, they may be trying to make something old sound new. Second, they may be trying to convince us of a new angle on something old. Third, they may be trying to fool us into believing something new really has been discovered.

A recent article on polyamory – a relatively new word – attempted to do all these things. The word polyamory attempts to make something old sound new, offers a new angle on something old, and presents itself as a newly discovered ideal. But, alas, the article was only a creative writer playing the name game. Polyamory is a just a new word for an old concept – adultery.

Polyamory means having multiple sexual partners. The definitions of those relationships vary, depending on the people involved. The participants involved in these relationships admit they are complicated, but that doesn’t deter them from attempting to make them work in the pursuit of personal fulfillment and sexual pleasure. Renaming helps legitimize the behavior and soften the cultural resistance to accepting it.

Renaming something, like adultery, attempts to remove the negative connotations associated with the original word. Adultery is bad; not much discussion about that. The Ten Commandments and even the culture at large condemn adultery. An adulterer is a liar and a cheater – not ways anyone wants to be described.

Polyamorous partner sounds much more pleasant, and attempts to remove these negative undertones. But playing the name game doesn’t belie the unfaithfulness, betrayal, and resulting pain adultery causes. Making up a new word to describe an old concept doesn’t remove its sting or its stain.

Preachers and teachers make their living with words. Making up new words to salve emotional wounds, attempt to alleviate guilt, or soften convictions about sinful behavior is not helpful. Let’s use words that communicate plain meaning, and when necessary, allowing pain-inducing words to motivate us to change. Being honest, with truthful words, is the name of the game.

Excerpt – John Piper, Calvinism, and Missions: A Way Forward

Read this section of Dr. Hopkins’ new book on the theology of John Piper.

Philip O. Hopkins
Associate Professor of Church History
Philip O. Hopkins is the associate professor of Church history at Gateway Seminary. He earned Ph.D. in applied theology from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and a second Ph.D. in Iranian history from the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). He is also a research fellow for the Institute of Iranian Studies at the University of St. Andrews, guest lecturer at Russian-Armenian University in Yerevan, Armenia, and part of the editorial board for Iran and the Caucasus (Brill).

Owning Up to the Failures of our Theological Heroes

What can be done when you discover the sins of historical figures who have shaped your theology?

Chris Woznicki
Affiliate Instructor in Theology at Fuller Seminary, JEC Research Fellow

Author’s Perspective: Andrew Fuller and the Search for a Faith Worthy of All Acceptation

Dr. David Rathel discusses his upcoming publication on Andrew Fuller.

David Rathel
Associate Professor of Christian Theology
Dr. Rathel is the associate professor of Chrisitian Theology at Gateway Seminary. Prior to Gateway, Dr. Rathel supplied pastoral care to churches in the United States and Scotland, served as an Adjunct Professor of Theology and Philosophy for the Baptist College of Florida, and provided teaching assistance for the University of St Andrews.